EMERGING PORTUGUESE PHOTOGRAPHER MIGUEL REFRESCO

 

EMERGING PORTUGUESE PHOTOGRAPHER MIGUEL REFRESCO

BY JIÔN KIIM

Miguel Refresco is one of the most emerging Portuguese photographers. Born in 1986 in Porto, Portugal, Miguel lives and works in Porto as a freelance photographer and photography teacher. He has a degree in Audiovisual Communication Technologies - specialization in Photography of ESMAE and Master in Contemporary Artistic Practices - FBAUP. He has developed documental works related to the issues of identity and territory that he has exhibited regularly since 2008. At the same time, he collaborates with “o Ballet Contemporâneo do Norte”, “Lovers and Lollypops” and “Capicua.” His work has been published in several publications: Vice Spain, Vice Portugal, Public, Observer, P3, Scopio Network, Terrafirma. He is a co-founder of the publishing house Álea. Lately, he's been participating in group exhibitions and opened his solo exhibition with his project "Promenade" from Balkan region in Espinho Auditorium and with a book presentation of "Menir" which is his 10 years of photography project in IPCI - Instituto de Produção Cultural e Imagem.

 

JK: Please tell us about your background.  Where and when did you study photography? What directed you towards a photographer?

MR: When I was a teenager, I wasn’t quite sure of what I wanted to study in college. I couldn’t decide if I wanted to enter a Law School or do other things like Audiovisual Communication. Eventually, I’ve decided to take a chance on a School of Media Arts and Design (IPP) and started to study Video, Sound and Photography. But it wasn’t before I went to Barcelona as an exchange student at Centre de la Imatge i la Tecnologia Multimèdia in Terrassa that I got interested in photography as I am today. Spending a lot of time alone, I had just enough time to develop new skills and techniques and I started focusing a lot on my final graduation project. But way before that, my parents got me a camera for my 9th birthday and I started taking a lot of pictures of my friends at school and during vacations. The camera still works!

 

JK: Who/what inspired or influenced you the most when you were studying?

MR: Looking back after all these years, I’ll have to say that it was probably the moment where I first presented my work at college to my classmates, without even knowing the shape of a photographic series nor authorial intent.So basically the thing that influenced me the most might have been my classmates and all the projects we’ve shared with each other. And, of course, my Erasmus period in Terrassa (a 40km-distant town from Barcelona) was also important. As I told you, because I spent a lot of time by myself, I had no other distractions besides my final project. Curiously, the University was quite more focused on technique rather than on the artistic approach of photography - nevertheless, I met two great Professors who taught me a lot, introducing a great deal of ideas that still influence my work today. Before this period, I was trying out a lot of techniques and styles more focused on the photojournalism aesthetics.

 

JK: Tell us more about your project as photographic research of that period.

MR: By that time, I was hoping to do my final Project in a specific neighborhood in Barcelona, called Carmel. A border region of Barcelona, with an astonishing view of the city where you could see traces of the Spanish Civil War (bunkers, guns, etc). It is hard to get to that specific place and there were lots of illegal occupation too: non-licensed construction and terrible conditions as well. My first attempt was trying to talk to its people, going inside their homes and tell them about the guidelines of my project. Obviously, with a combination of apathy and aggressiveness, my proposals were constantly rejected. Eventually, I started giving up on Carmel and my work became more spontaneous, less premeditated (I was just photographing without any defined or specific goal) – I’m sure that this episode still influences the way I work on my photography series: suddenly, the work shows up and you never know when it starts nor when it finishes. This gradual discovery of my working process – well, if we can even call it a process – turned it into a more spontaneous method: my camera as a constant presence of my day and photographing whatever comes along. During my stay at Terrassa, I spent most of my day time walking. Maybe strolling around is the correct way to put it since I didn’t have any destination whatsoever on my mind. All photographs that were part of “Untitled Ruptures” had this mark, of someone who was always passing by. However, it’s not a clear mark.

 

JK: Tell us about your last editorial project with your new Label.

MR: Álea is an editorial project created by Daniel Costa and myself in 2016 and it was born from our desire of publishing the work of several artists we admire and follow. “Menir” seemed like a viable option for the label's first publication since we both knew it quite well and it the project was already in an advanced stage. No image in "Menir" was specifically thought to be published in a book. They are pictures that, gradually, started dialogue with each other due to little experiments for some exhibitions. Some of them determine the structure of the work - a good example of it is the opening image of the book, "Oakland" or "Greenwich" . You feel something is growing out of it and it will be hard for it to fade away. The moment where you start thinking of those pictures as a book coincides with a "subtraction stage": this means, thinking about the amount of images and trying out to delete all the obvious connections between the pages and any other kind of narrative. I get the sense that if I try to draw a narrative, I'll shut the opportunity for others to pop in and, in this book, this would be something that I was really trying to avoid. The book includes photos taken between 2006 and 2016 in several different places - from Porto, to Galiza, Cataluña and Minho region of Portugal. Despite the diversity, I link it a lot to Barcelona.

 

JK: I couldn't find any text or statement in your book. Is there any specific reason or intension as an author?

MR: As a matter of fact, that’s quite an interesting question since we discussed it and thought of it for months. We gave up any text whatsoever because in all of our experiments we felt that with it the book was becoming something else; its aura of the unknown stone strolling around space would vanish. All information that we decided to include was the name of the author, title and date (in the dustjacket) - and even those can be removed at any time. This was something that we came round to after several tries, there was no initial intention, but rather a consequence of all failed experiments. All information we didn’t include in the book are at the label’s website: www.aleaeditora.pt.

 

JK: Tell us more about your main interests. Which project are you working on? Any ideas for the future?

MR: Currently, we’re working of the distribution of the book. Personally, I’ve been focused on a project called Intermittent Fasting. It all comes down to fast for a 16-hour period and it took me to the a new project organized in volumes in which I explore a place that I’ve been just for a short time. I came up with this after a work trip to Funchal where I stayed less than 24 hours. Actually, it looks the antithesis of Menir which is built from a 10-year-old work. Up until this moment, there are three volumes: I Funchal, II Vilamoura, III Cíclades, each one with very specific formal characteristics. Three objects with very distinctive guidelines with an intention in common: at some point, they should look as a travel guide - Volume I was thought to be published as a leaflet. I like the idea of working in the immediate, without having to be stuck at a story or a long-run project; thinking of the same relevancy and legitimacy of a two-day project as a 5/10-year-old one.

 

JK: For which reason, you've been in those places if you didn't have any idea of the project?

MR: As I told you before, I try to include photography in my daily life, therefore I didn’t go to any of those places specifically to photograph. I went there either for professional or personal reasons. Obviously I have choices to make in those places; I know that specific zone in Vilamoura ou Funchal will be more appealing for the kind of images I do, but it’s a spontaneous decision. For this specific project - Intermittent Fasting - the less I know the better.

 

JK: What are your inspirations in terms of books and photographers that influence you the most? Can you recommend some book to our readers?

MR: It’s always a hard task to tell you what influences me the most because it goes way beyond books or authors. I get a lot of inspiration from the daily life, in my case music and food - that walk side by side with each other since I cook while listening to music. But also walking and riding my car inspire me a lot. Regarding photography, I guess one of the last things I’ve read was a book that gathers interviews to several artists working on photobooks, it’s called “Photography Between Covers – interview with photobook makers”. During the 70s, Tom Dugan interviewed Larry Clark, Ralph Gibson, Robert Adams, Duane Michals, among others. Actually, I now remember that Volume III of Intermittent Fasting - Cyclades has the obvious influence of “Um Adeus aos Deuses” of Rúben A.

 

JK: Could you refer some emerging photographers who recently interested you? And why.

MR: This week, I came across the work of two authors that I hadn’t seen in a while: Alejandra Nuñez who documented the whole catalan punk-rock scene and Joana Castelo’s work on Vietnam.

 

JK: You took part in various exhibitions. Any particular advice for young photographers aspiring to display and exhibit their work without drowning in the ocean of images in which we daily swim?

MR: I have no advice to give, as a matter of fact. The idea of an ocean of images is beautiful, as long as you know how to swim in it. It is something that we need to learn how to deal with. Instagram might be that ocean: a young student today has a much more critic opinion on photography than what he could have had 20 years ago - at least because you have to choose one picture among many to publish. He spent that time deciding which elements of the image will make him choose it over others and I can either be talking about a random selfie or a self aware act of a photographer. I try to be optimistic.

 

JK: With rapid and continuous technological change those who want to pursue a creative career must always be updated. In addition, the vast competition requires more skills to young people entering the labor market. What are the tips and suggestions you have for the younger generation? Any particular advice for the young photographers?

MR: Technology is not mandatorily connected to the evolution of photography. I can’t see such an obvious correlation: some tools help, others don’t, it’s much more about the way you decide to work. Technology is a tool that can help you materialize your ideas.

 

JK: How do you think the internet and everything that is connected is affecting the production and sharing of projects and images?

MR: It’s quite a complex issue, but I guess it has more advantages than disadvantages. For promotion and sharing is great and it’s cheaper. All that involves democratization and free access to tools for creation and promotion sound great and, for this, internet has been remarkable. I like the idea of sharing and if it is easier to share I like it. In the other hand, in Instagram for example, you could easily have connection with your favorite artists.

 

JK: Do you have any opinion about us, scopio network?

MR: I think it’s a great platform because it works such a vast area as architecture and urbanism, divided into smaller and particular branches. It’s funny that you ask that, because a few weeks ago I was reading an author project at Scopio and, two and a half hour later, I was still reading articles on the website that had nothing to do with the original topic. It’s a diverse platform, not diffusing.

 

* "Traversed by a meridian where time passes stumbling and guideless,“Menir” stirs Iberian geography. It is a cycle of images that doesn’t renew itself (2009 to 2016), where Miguel’s photographic gesture is swift, and the quality of testimony is less of the realm of duration, actually belonging to that of the spirits who evade the insense, errant. We leave “Menir” as we do a long day of sleepless nights. From here on, the images will be different."

website

 

PHOTOGRAPHER, SÉNIOR LECTURER AT ESMAE-IPP OLÍVIA DA SILVA

 

PHOTOGRAPHER, SÉNIOR LECTURER AT ESMAE-IPP

BY PEDRO LEÃO AND MARIA NETO


PL_MN: Tell us about your background, where and when did you study photography, who were your teachers, who influenced you the most?

ODS: As part of my own development I studied photography as a research student to both masters and doctorate levels at the University of Derby (UK). My references  as a profissionals, lectures of Photography ‘s Manuel Silveira Ramos, José Soudo, Fernando Veludo, Luís Pavão, Karen Knorr, Jean Baird, Val Wiliams, Steve Edwards, Oded Shimson between others. I  was fortunate to receive support from Lisbon Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, from the Portuguese Photography Center (CPF), from the polytechnic Of Porto and collegueas, I have been working in ESMAE since 1992, and currently, I am a member of the research group in the European Research Center of Photography ECPR at the University of South Wales (UK). I am also a Research Member of NIMAE from i2ADS, Research Center of Art, Design and Sociology of Fine Arts School of Porto, FBAUP.

PL_MN: What was your first teaching experience? What directed you towards a teaching career?

ODS: My first teaching experience was Philosophy at a number of secondary schools across this region. I launched my own photography group/club in Espinho, and I came to teaching photography at this higher level as a direct result of my work as a photographic journalist for the local newspaper Maré Viva from Espinho, and later in national newspaper Público. At the beginning, I was teaching and working for the newspaper, and it is the teaching that has eventually taking over as a career. Within this context I have been involved in several photography festivals, such as: the meetings of photography in Coimbra; the meetings of Images, in Braga; the Bienal of Vila Franca de Xira;Fotoporto in Serralves Foundation; Arquivo Fotográfico de Lisboa run by Luisa Costa Dias; Rencontres d'Arles and in Niort, France; The Photographers’ Gallery in London; The FFotogallery in Cardiff(UK); Center of Photography Studies in Vigo (Cefvigo) and Encontros no Convento de Arrábida orgnaized by Fundação Oriente e Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (John Stathathos, Susan Butler, Ian Jeffrey, Jorge Molder, entre outros participantes).  All of these have at some point or another been a fantastic influence upon my chosen profession.

PL_MN: What about your professional and artistic paths, and photographic research? Tell us about your main interests and what projects you have worked on in recent years. What are you working on now? Any ideas for the future?

ODS: The course I am currently responsible for is a Masters degree with options in Photography and Cinema. This  is focused on the areas of documentary and fiction, theory and practice (with the emphasis on the creation of a portfolio of evidence). Festival of NEW NOW, ELIA,  Orient Foundation , eCPR, European Centre for Photographic Research , with South Wales University UK, Artist Residencies  as Serra da Freita in  Arouca, Minas da Boralha in Montalegre and  Mesão Frio, Douro Region. Internships Projects with  Portuguese Photography Centre (CPF) ,  Historical Archive(Casa do Infante) in Porto , City Hall Photographic Archive of Lisbon, Robinson Foundation of Portalegre. Publication of papers, portfolios in magazines, catalogs and books. Permanent collaboration with Politema(IPP), Editorial Scopio (UP), PRATA Magazine on line, ARCHIVO Magazine. Exhibition of films selected for Doclisboa programing, Olhares Frontais by Viana do Castelo, Micef /ESAP– International Festival of Films  from  Film Schools, Avanca - International Conference of Film, Art, Technology and Communication. Inserted into the Project ‘Estaleiro’ International  Short Film Festival of Vila do CondeVarious Awards and Honorable Mentions. Supported annually by the Film and Audiovisual Institute (ICA) from Lisbon.

During the first year, students are encouraged to organise a residency in a region of Portugal. This is usually in a village or a small town and not a large urban metropolis. As part of the course there is a great deal of work that goes into pre-production, first-hand research and negotiations with various institutions and individuals, as appropriate. We ensure that the relationship between the students and the location extends beyond the project itself, and we arrange for a public viewing/exhibition within the location and with the participation and involvement of those people who have featured in the work. This is considered to be as important as submitting the projects for national festivals, competitions between others.

During the second year, students develop a personal, rather than a group, project and dissertation on a negotiated theme. As an alternative a student might also be involved in a placement within an archive, museum, independent studio, newspaper, or a television channel. Opportunities are created for student mobility, in order to study or seek internship abroad, in accordance with protocols that DAI/ESMAE/IPP holds with leading institutions of higher education with France, Spain and United Kingdom.

The course organises its own annual conference about Documentary Photography and Cinema, IRI – Imagens do Real Imaginado and during this public event, a national and an international jury is invited to assess the work of our students.

I am also involved in the Licenciatura (undergraduate) course, and my role is to support students in developing a final project and public exhibition. My role also includes the teaching the history of photography and image theory. On top of this I am usually involved in the supervision of a doctorate thesis and have responsibility for research projects at both masters and PhD level, on behalf my own and a number of other universities. I am also a supervisor for scholarship researchers in the areas of photography and multimedia, with support from Santander Bank & the Polytechnic Institute Of Porto (IPP). I am currently the representative for ESMAE and IPP at ADDICT.

PL_MN: We know how hard it is when teaching to find the time and focus to develop a personal research and to answer simultaneously to professional requests. Can you tell us your experience and if there are any project that you are now working on? What are your inspirations in terms of books and photographers that you have loved the most? Do you have a book to recommend to our readers? Which emerging photographer has recently interested you?

ODS: I can mention Robert Polidori, Paul Seawright (Ireland, 1965), Luc Delahaye (France, 1964), Mitch Epstein (USA, 1952), Guy Tillim (South Africa, 1962), Boris Mikhailov (Ukrainian, 1938) approaching the concerns of photojournalism art or the artistic documentalism defended by Mark Durden (1963, UK, author of Photography Today Phaidon).

PL_MN: You took part in many exhibitions. Any particular advice for young photographers aspiring to display and exhibit their work without drowning in the ocean of images in which we daily swim?

ODS: It is certainly true that finding the time for personal projects and responding to professional commitments in a school of higher learning increasingly difficult. In those areas of technical and artistic education the relationship between involvement in artistic and academic projects must be desirable and balanced, wanting to assert that we should not let our connection completely to artistic practice.

Today there is a greater openness to include in the portuguese academy in an artistic but not desirable for those who have finished a doctoral degree in Photography in 2001 evolving research space. This artistic research allows greater investment in doctoral degrees provided academic offer of English universities with whom I have worked, so I'm keeping a more regular contacts with foreign universities and with the supervision of such work. Consequently, I have been more remote from personal projects, although last year collaborated on a group exhibition The Benedictine Orders ('Ora & Labora', Olivia Da Silva) in a research doctoral degree in the Faculty of Engineering about Distributed Artificial Intelligence & Intelligent Simulation by Horácio Marques and also in another group exhibition  integrated into the Partnership for Urban Regeneration (PRU) of Santo Tirso City (PRU) (‘Wire of the hank’, Olivia Da Silva) with a PhD student from the University of South Wales UK. I am pleased to share the artistic research of researchers working with different areas of the image, As I intend to collaborate objectively consolidation of research identifying the parameters of artistic fields and wean them from the investigation of parameters social sciences. It seems to me essential to know and defend the work done by Gillian Rose and Sarah Pink, among others, on these matters.

Finding scholarships and other forms of support for photographic projects is not at all easy, particular when the project serves creative or artistic ends, rather than servicing the research of others. There are still those who do not accept that artistic approaches to photography are capable of contributing to knowledge. In my own experience, the documentary nature of my work dictates extensive contact with the people and places that are the subject of my photography. Part of this same approach is all about the relationship between the subject and the photographer and there are no short-cuts to the kind of negotiation and dialogue that must take place throughout the project.

Currently, I am working with a group of women in a way that explores physical and personality traits that extend across various generations, and this involves looking at existing images relating to previous generations, as well as developing original/new images.

My inspiration/influences include: Jorge Molder, Afonso Furtado and Manuel Magalhães (1980s). More recently: Rinike Dijnstra in particular her video portraits of teenagers in Liverpool, and her maternity images; Karen Knorr and her images of English gentlemen in their clubs and Lynn Silverman with ‘Interior’ ; John Goto, New World Circus and Gilt City(UK) and Anibal Lemos, Europa Hoje (Portugal). In terms of literature, I am impressed with ‘Figuras do Espanto’ theory and history of photography as expresssed by Pedro Miguel Frade; ‘História da Imagem Fotográfica em Portugal’ by António Sena; the articles of Jorge Calado concerning photography. Influences from outside Portugal include: Richard Bolton, John Tagg, Victor Burgin, Allan Sekula. I particularly enjoy texts that encourage us to think about images and so I would include here: Ian Jeffrey and Mark Durden. Several women, such as Sarah Pink, Halla Bellof, Magarida Medeiros, Filomena Molder, Teresa Siza, Maria de Carmo Serén, Adriana Baptista , Susana Ventura, Marianne Hirsch, Martha Rosler and Liz Wells.

Emerging photographer Sérgio Rolando, with is work about Douro hotels where he builds a dialogue between himself, the place, and pre-existing images of the same location, and also Emanuel Brás, with his landscapes of rural Ribatejo, where photographic representation focuses on the current form of transformation of agricultural land. The endless number of photo images registration does not build an observer, may eventually create an immeasurable file about what 'look' but not about what 'we'. For we see that we have observed so thought, reflected and know how to select to build a balanced photographic narrative without overdoing the amount that can become boring. Therefore, it seems important to make the right choices and these seem to me to be those who claim an author. An author should be worried about getting their message to others in a creative and imaginative way, not bleaching the technical mastery of the photographic medium.

All details of a public exhibition are fundamental to create unity in the visual message that the author wants to convey through photography. I often warn my students that since the choice of space (kind of public space: the museum, the gallery, the street; dimension of space; specificity and quality, etc.) through the sequence of images (number, size, captions, technical specificities etc.) to the title or text of presentation (type and size of letter), among other details are fundamental to be seen and visited. And of course, all this should be configured dynamically in order to encourage visitors to explore the exhibition and appreciate the relationship between the information and the theme proposed by the author. After all who notes must want to be motivated from the observation of others.

As a good photo printer unequivocally contributed to the success of many photographers documentalists of 60 or 70 years of the twentieth century, a time when the book was the final presentation object work of a photographer (The  Americans by Robert Frank, Let us now praise famous men by Walker Evans, The Europeans by  Henri Cartier Bresson, Lisboa ,Cidade Triste e Alegre by Victor Palla & Costa Martins)  today the exhibition came to occupy this space in documentary photography. So the issue of an exposure of a photographic work is so important as the work itself, especially because the public has many and diverse ways to  acess photographic images. A good editor and a good designer is essential to create a photographic exhibition that attracts public, although less familiar with what is photographic object of artistic value with display quality. An editor makes a photographer a successful artist.

PL_MN: With rapid and continuous technological change those who want to pursue a creative career must always be updated. In addition, the vast competition requires more skills to young people entering the labor market. What are the tips and suggestions you have for the younger generation? How do you think the internet and everything that is connected is affecting the production and sharing of projects and images? What’s your opinion about the Portuguese photography panorama?

ODS: Be available to learn and share experiences with other photographers.

New technologies provide the photographer with a useful vehicle for the dissemination and the promotion of his/her work, and also allows for the written exchange of response and criticism. Online specialist magazines such as: Portfolio (Contemporary Photography in Britain stopped coming out) , Source, Aperture  and other platforms are the source of an amazing volume of work from around the globe (this also includes equipment reviews, specifications and purchasing).

Young / new photographers are able to create a website and this can be a disorganised or unfocused array of images and accompanying text. My advice would be to encourage the creation of a more thoughtful and organised approach; one that would go a long way towards establishing the identity and personality of the photographer and his/her work. The Internet can also provide a useful tool for the planning of work and exhibitions of work, in advance of actual print and production. The net can also be used to self-publish.

The quality of image making, everywhere, is high, but it is heavily influence by cinema and other media. This is quite a difficult question to answer, if only because there are a great many projects that concentrate upon specific communities, whilst at the same time other photographers prefer to work with otherwise ‘empty’ landscapes, that could be experienced in quite a remote way. Something has changed with the arrival of digital photography and the software that allows us to manipulate images almost without limits. Geographic  spaces can be created without the need to travel and the temporal differences between analogical and digital processes are significant. There are several arguments about a ‘new photography era’ , the pos-photography  mencionada por Fred Ritchin, in  his book ‘After Photography’ or with  Juan Fontcuberta his landscapes in ‘Orogenesis’ séries.

 

PHILIPPE RUAULT: ARCHITECTURE AND PHOTOGRAPHY

 

PHILIPPE RUAULT: ARCHITECTURE AND PHOTOGRAPHY

BY SUSANA VENTURA

SUSANA VENTURA: Do you think photography is able to represent the lived space of architecture? If so, how can it do it? Or, more generally, how would you describe the relation between photography and architecture?

PHILIPPE RUAULT: For me, it’s pretty clear that photography may represent the space. All it takes is simply getting “la bonne distance” (the right distance) between the self and architecture, the architect. But architectural photography is changing so quickly. Does it still exist?

SV: How do you find that “bonne distance”?

PR: Immediately, spontaneously, but after having thought about the architectural pro- ject: the correct rapport between me and the architectural object.

SV: What leads you to take a certain photograph? Or what makes you opt for a certain composition, frame, and luminosity, instead of others?

PR: Architecture and the building work altogether as a coherent whole, an open space both to the exterior and the interior. Architecture is in a state of absence, it is in between the world, nature, and the inhabitants of the place. Photography is in the center of all that like a carrier, a passerby. My photography must express that emotion.

SV: Do you believe that emotion belongs to the work of architecture and can your photographs extract it, allowing us to experience the same emotion through the photograph? Or the emotion we perceive through the photograph is another kind of emotion, one that you have composed (because photography is not the indifferent medium that we sometimes think of; it produces space and fabricates emotions)?

PR: I think that the observer runs through all these different emotions and lives his own emotions according to his culture, his experiences.

SV: When we look at your photographs of the different works of architecture built by various architects, we are immediately sent back to their work. For instance, in your photographs of Jean Nouvel’s work it is common to find a photograph playing with reflections. Immediately, we think of how Jean Nouvel usually plays with the real and the virtual in his buildings or when he adds several layers to generate an ambiguous perception of the real. On the other hand, we also easily perceive your own elements of composition: you don’t use reflections in a traditional way, sometimes you introduce both time and movement in the photograph (such as in that beautiful photograph of the Minneapolis theatre interior), you use color in a very specific way (usually as light)...

What do you think about the relation between the different works of architecture, the different architects that have designed them and your own ideas of photography?

PR: Firstly, it is about understanding the project and how it is formally done. Then photography must have its own means (and the photographic one translates this form). The photographer is a “carrier” who has the privilege of living the experience directly and the possibility of providing it with a form.

SV: What is the role of desire in your work?

PR: What you need is not a particular kind of desire, just the need to feel up for everything: what is there, what may arrive without being judgmental. To feel good in your body and in your head.

 

PHILIPPE RUAULT: LA BONNE DISTANCE

 

PHILIPPE RUAULT: LA BONNE DISTANCE

BY SUSANA VENTURA

SV: I think that it’s almost impossible to understand L&V’s architecture without your photographs regarding the link between the two. How have you met Anne Lacaton and Jean-Philippe Vassal?

PR: Chance and coincidence are essential in that relationship. I work with Jean Nouvel and Rem Koolhaas, who are very much opposed to it at the moment. Anne and Jean Philippe are a third source of discovery and of stimulating interests. I take a bit of both but express it in an original way.

SV: Imagine that you are visiting an L&V’s work for the first time but that you are not supposed to photograph it. As an inhabitant, what would you feel in this first encounter with the work? How would you describe your perception of it?

PR: From the first experience of the architecture of Lacaton & Vassal, all seems effortlessly intelligent and without a demonstrative effect, when, actually, there’s a whole work behind what is apparently evident. The result is a feeling of lightness, well being, simply freedom.

SV: Is there any kind of previous knowledge about the work you’re going to photograph, such as a conversation with Anne and Jean- Philippe about the work – not about the photographs, because I believe they don’t tell you what photographs they want, but about the ideas that we can find in the work from the beginning? Or are you at your own risk?

PR: I met Anne and Jean Philipe after the Maison Latapie, over 15 years ago. We were introduced by a mutual friend, Patrice Goulet, at the Jean Nouvel exhibition at Arc en Rêve in Bordeaux. Then we had passionate discus- sions over a glass of a Bordeaux wine in bars and restaurants. We have some mutual friends and we share common interests in many areas like art, football, or orchids. In fact, it took me a long time to really understand their way of seeing things, of analyzing them, of apprehending the world in general. Their relationship with the world is very original, it stems from all the ideas derived from their great freedom. My character has a very different nature, it is less simple, but I admire their ability of looking at things without a priori moral judgments, so I try to understand and adopt their ways.

SV: When you are taking photos, what happens between you and the work or space that you are photographing? How would you describe the relation between your photographs and the experience you have of space?

PR: Having understood their way of seeing the world, in our conversations, allows me to start the photographic point of view without a specific intent or any preconceived ideas, thus, in total freedom... I would even say in a certain state of indifference, which allows me to escape all the issues, the problems that always arise in architecture photography.

SV: You usually include people in your photographs of an L&V’s work. Actually, all architecture made by L&V has its primary focus on the inhabitants – their desires, their pleasures, their comfort... – and your photographs tend to sublimate the way people appropriate space. But that’s not all: the objects are usually left in space as if they had been casually found and as if there was no one around. We can look at the photographs and see how space is inhabited by the traces we find in it. I believe that there is a kind of realism in your photographs (following a photography tradition) and it’s curious that Dietmar Steiner called the architecture of L&V “dirty realism”. I think this expression is more appropriate if one looks at your L&V’s photographs. What are your concerns, intentions and aesthetic aims when you are shooting?

PR: That distance allows me to photograph people in the same way, without hierarchy, in their simplicity. It is not about making reportage or aesthetically doing sociology, it is not naturalism. I don’t say anything more than what is already there. Everything is there as a finished potential.

SV: There seems to be a perfect harmony between your photographs and L&V’s ideas about the spaces they create. In fact, if one looks at their photomontages (usually made by David Pradel) and your photographs, we sometimes find the same picture or image (we may look at examples of works such as the Mulhouse houses or the Palais de Tokyo). Is it a coincidence or is it on purpose?

PR: It is true that the similarity with the images of David Pradel is troubling, but I believe that we all simply bathe in this same atmosphere of freedom created by the architecture of Lacaton & Vassal.

SV: Nature is a constant presence in your photographs as it is in L&V’s work, and in both it is almost like an inhabitant. What is nature’s importance to you?

PR: Once again, it is important the equality of treatment between all the different elements (nature, objects, and inhabitants) without distinction.

SV: Sometimes, you are asked to photograph an L&V’s work for a second time and after it has been inhabited for long. How do you feel and what do you usually look for when this happens?

PR: Returning to a building by Lacaton & Vassal may be difficult when one had the feeling, thefirsttime,ofhavinglivedthatexperience to the full. The freedom of the first time may be difficult to relive.

APPENDIX: INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNIQUES

SV: What instruments do you use for shooting and, then, for finalizing a picture?

You usually take color photographs. Is there any special reason for this?

PR: I only work in a 4x5 silver color chamber, because there has never been anything different from black and white. It is a false issue, at least, regarding what really matters in architecture photography – i.e., the question oftherelationshipbetweenthephotographer and the thing. Hence, the distance he creates in an original way between himself and architecture.

SV: Do you retouch photographs after shooting to correct anything?

PR:The photographs are taken without retouching, from the very first moment until the time they are used. I don’t touch anything in the building. I try to take advantage of all their potential without artifices.

SV:What makes you reject a photograph?

PR:The photographer’s greatest wish of wanting to create a work of art, of architecture vampirism, makes bad architecture photography. The use of people or objects is a big problem nowadays.

 

PHILIPPE RUAULT: ARCHITECTURE AND PHOTOGRAPHY

 

PHILIPPE RUAULT: ARCHITECTURE AND PHOTOGRAPHY

BY SUSANA VENTURA

This interview should have been kept in French: its original language. There are certain words and expressions that cannot be translated in a literal way because they lose some of the power they evoke, as, for instance, in the expression “la bonne distance”, which Philippe Ruault uses to describe his approach to architectural photography. “La bonne distance” does not simply refer to the distance between subject and object mediated by any photographic apparatus or device, even when this is not a simple relation at all. Moreover, “la bonne distance” is a virtual plane that emerges between the photographer and the space. It’s a plane of composition that the photographer creates when he is shooting. The plane is itself indifferent (another meaning that distance evokes) but it is through this instance that the photographer sets all the elements that are going to compose the photograph and, at the same time, takes out everything that can menace its composition. The realism of Philippe Ruault’s photographs is thus a false issue because, even if what is represented looks like reality as it is, his photographs lead il.cus to move ahead and look beyond that seeming objectiveness. Sometimes we may even have to take a second look to go beyond the photograph and find also “la bonne distance” between ourselves, reality and the photograph. This second distance certainly overlaps the one found by the photographer himself and allows us to look at the space represented in its full meaning, since “la bonne distance” underlines and sublimates the architectural space itself. Even if Philippe Ruault says that he uses photography’s own means, we find a double movement in his photographs. The composition tends to underline spaces’ composition, light emphasizes the high contrasts with which architecture plays, between mass, shadow, light and color, to the very choice of showing how people appropriate the space. The photograph is here the perfect simulacrum. We may also consider these means as architectonic, but then, what separates photography from architecture? “La bonne distance”, which is perception.

 

WITH BAS PRINCEN: INSTRUMENTS 

 

WITH BAS PRINCEN: INSTRUMENTS 

BY SUSANA VENTURA

SV: It’s often said about your photographs that they have an almost surreal, fiction like, atmosphere. One of the most amazing characteristics of photography, as Walter Benjamin put it, is that the camera, the mechanical apparatus, allows you to bring to the image surface an unconscious aspect of the reality which the organic eye is unable to see (what made the first photographs in history so surprising). Although the photograph presents reality, it goes beyond reality, reaching the unknown and the unconscious of reality. I find this very quality in your photographs as they present an unconscious of the contemporary city or of the artificial and natural landscapes. It’s not only due to the frame – which is the one of the basic elements of a photographic composition – but mainly because they are constructed between two intense movements of colour: saturation and rarefaction. A saturation of colours to intensify the idea of a landscape (in some photographs, you even get close to a geological work) and sometimes a rarefaction of colours, of elements in order to bring the volumes at their limit, as pure objects in a rarefied landscape. For example, in your photographs of Dubai, we can feel the desert, its temperature, the dry atmosphere, the tension, only through colour. The colour comes first and only then do our eyes land in the volume and in the limits of the frame and only afterwards do we start to think about the relations between the building and the landscape. What are your main elements of composition? How do you use the frame – which you often speak of – and how do you use colour as light, for example?

BAS: There are many ways how a composition starts but, of course, there are certain types of composition that i like to use, or to start from. I think that is true for every photographer and you somehow search for a similar way to organise the image, this evolves over time. I can tell myself when I made a certain photograph because of the way it is visually organized. But then I use also a lot of, or I have a lot of references to which I look, references out of the history of architecture, or just images that I find appealing. Those images are used in order tomakeastartforanewworkorforanew type of image. So, I have many of these and I would combine five or six in order to imag- ine the new work. Imagining in a way that I imagine myself in front of the place that I would like to photograph. Sometimes when I’m at a place that I think has potential, I start to dig mentally in my memory and find out which type of images could resonate with the place where I am at that point and then I start to organise the camera in a similar way, and if what I see on the camera screen resonates with these images that I have in my head, I’m getting exited, and normally it results in a good image.

SV: Can you give some examples, for instance? I know that there isn’t a direct relation between the image and the photograph, but what do you look for in those images that you store in your computer? Why have they become so important to you?

BAS: They are important, because they are representing a certain image that has already a background. They have been looked at by people, so maybe they have a more universal quality that we can recognise and I like to use that as a kind of unconscious way to make it easier to enter the image. I think that is the main reason why I use them. And also that my images become part of a progression of images that I didn’t make.

SV: It’s a nice idea. It’s almost like the land- scape and the cities are formed, little pieces and parts through time and you add another part that relates to the old parts altogether.

BAS: I think you need it otherwise it is difficult to even see something for other people. If it is something completely new, you lack reference, and there is no point from which you can start to look at the image. It’s some- thing that I am really interested in: you have certain ways how you build an image and those are I guess universal and they keep return over time: from landscape paintings in the Golden age, to the new topographics and the depiction of landscapes in movies, for instance. And I think you have to learn about them and you can use all these presets. I’ve started to collect images that I find appealing in terms of content or composition or colour scheme, and I try to incorporate these givens as – let’s say – unconscious rules into the compositions that I make. Of course, you run the risk of being too classical, but this also depends on the references that you choose, of course.

SV: Everything is evolving, so you are in fact adding another chapter.

BAS: Yes. So, basically, from these refer- ences I make a kind of little booklets – there are about five now and they are just for myself to understand certain things, they are not meant to be published or to be made public. They are filled with images that I find out on internet – they are many, many at  my archive – and I organise these images in such a way that I find it an interesting com- position, in how they follow each other up. In the end, you could say, that these booklets with references are some kind of placehold- ers for a real book. This is the little booklet which I made for the Reservoir book – if you open the Reservoir book on the first page, you can imagine that the first three images – so, page one and two and tree of the refer- ence booklet – if you combine them, they somehow become the second picture in the ‘reservoir’ book (future olympic park).

SV: I would like to know a little bit more about your use of colour.

BAS: I don’t think I do a lot to the colour. I understand that most of the pictures have one type of tone or colour, but it’s not that I change it. It’s more that while I am looking for an image part of the reason for photograph- ing something, is because also the light and colour are in a good organisation.

SV: But in the end, they all seem to have a saturation – as in your Dubai photographs – where you can feel the dry atmosphere and the tension and the temperature – and all comes from the colour and not, for instance, of the frame or of other elements.

BAS: I think that the colour is always quite coolish...

SV: How do you control it? Or are you not really conscious of the process?

BAS: I am conscious. I work always with the same person with whom I am printing and I think that makes a big difference. He knows me well and we speak a lot about a certain continuity in the contrast and colour.

SV: So, is the colour a post-production?

BAS: No... at least not by default, there are two ways. While taking the photograph I take care that the colour palette is in my benefit or that it fits the other pictures I’ve already made. And sometimes, it’s just the technique of how you photograph. I think that it’s similar to the way compositions seem to reoccur, you can also search for similar compositions in colour or colour schemes. I think that if the colour is not good, then I don’t even see the image. It’s part of the decision to photograph a place, that the colour should be in sync with the composition. Then, in the end, in the post-production not a lot is done, just the image is made a little bit cooler or maybe the contrast is a little bit adapted. It’s funny, because the first book that I’ve made was in Holland and it has only with grey skies and sandy colours and at a point I would really freak out if there was a little sun and then I couldn’t photograph, it was impossible. And then I went photographing in L.A., Dubai, and those photographs are taken with blaz- ing sunshine, and people are still telling me that even in the pictures of those places it’s is foggy and they don’t realise it’s sunny.

SV: Yes, Reservoir is pretty grey!

BAS: It should be. When the light is tough or hard, and you photograph against the light, you have a limited set of colours, you will always have that idea of a greyish tone. The colours then are in the same tone. They’re never opposing.

SV: Maybe this has also to do with another feature of your work: the idea of surface. Even when you photograph isolated vol- umes that stand in the landscape, they somehow become flat. They are treated like surfaces and not like volumes. For instance, there are some photographers that like to photograph in black & white, because the volumes are accentuated.

BAS: I believe that they are the same in my photographs: volume and landscape naturally belong together. To me, they are the same surface. The only thing is that one is vertical and the other one is horizontal, differences are in the materiality or the colour and that can indicate a three dimensional shape.

SV: What would you say about that relation between surface and volume?

BAS: The surface is not only the ground and volume is not automatically a building or an object. Definitely in a photograph these 2 can act similar, sometimes a volume is suggested while it is not there, and I’m most interested in the fact that in the photograph you can play with these 2 and let them merge or take each others place. Surface to me is where materials are coming together, and then is all about how these materials interact. So both object and landscape are made of surface and those 2 have surfaces that can come together in an interesting way, that they are naturally fitting. I like this idea of naturally fit- ting: things that are believable when they are combined. This is something I would work on when I am photographing or when I am doing post-production, this is important to me. Well, you could say again – what is natural, what is man-made – is somehow put together and in a way you can say surfaces and colours are very important for that.

SV: It’s often said about your photographs that they have an almost surreal, fiction like, atmosphere. One of the most amazing characteristics of photography, as Walter Benjamin put it, is that the camera, the mechanical apparatus, allows you to bring to the image surface an unconscious aspect of the reality which the organic eye is unable to see (what made the first photographs in history so surprising). Although the photograph presents reality, it goes beyond reality, reaching the unknown and the unconscious of reality. I find this very quality in your photographs as they present an unconscious of the contemporary city or of the artificial and natural landscapes. It’s not only due to the frame – which is the one of the basic elements of a photographic composition – but mainly because they are constructed between two intense movements of colour: saturation and rarefaction. A saturation of colours to intensify the idea of a landscape (in some photographs, you even get close to a geological work) and sometimes a rarefaction of colours, of elements in order to bring the volumes at their limit, as pure objects in a rarefied landscape. For example, in your photographs of Dubai, we can feel the desert, its temperature, the dry atmosphere, the tension, only through colour. The colour comes first and only then do our eyes land in the volume and in the limits of the frame and only afterwards do we start to think about the relations between the building and the landscape. What are your main elements of composition? How do you use the frame – which you often speak of – and how do you use colour as light, for example?

BAS: There are many ways how a composition starts but, of course, there are certain types of composition that i like to use, or to start from. I think that is true for every photographer and you somehow search for a similar way to organise the image, this evolves over time. I can tell myself when I made a certain photograph because of the way it is visually organized. But then I use also a lot of, or I have a lot of references to which I look, references out of the history of architecture, or just images that I find appealing. Those images are used in order tomakeastartforanewworkorforanew type of image. So, I have many of these and I would combine five or six in order to imag- ine the new work. Imagining in a way that I imagine myself in front of the place that I would like to photograph. Sometimes when I’m at a place that I think has potential, I start to dig mentally in my memory and find out which type of images could resonate with the place where I am at that point and then I start to organise the camera in a similar way, and if what I see on the camera screen resonates with these images that I have in my head, I’m getting exited, and normally it results in a good image.

SV: Can you give some examples, for instance? I know that there isn’t a direct relation between the image and the photograph, but what do you look for in those images that you store in your computer? Why have they become so important to you?

BAS: They are important, because they are representing a certain image that has already a background. They have been looked at by people, so maybe they have a more universal quality that we can recognise and I like to use that as a kind of unconscious way to make it easier to enter the image. I think that is the main reason why I use them. And also that my images become part of a progression of images that I didn’t make.

SV: It’s a nice idea. It’s almost like the land- scape and the cities are formed, little pieces and parts through time and you add another part that relates to the old parts altogether.

BAS: I think you need it otherwise it is difficult to even see something for other people. If it is something completely new, you lack reference, and there is no point from which you can start to look at the image. It’s some- thing that I am really interested in: you have certain ways how you build an image and those are I guess universal and they keep return over time: from landscape paintings in the Golden age, to the new topographics and the depiction of landscapes in movies, for instance. And I think you have to learn about them and you can use all these presets. I’ve started to collect images that I find appealing in terms of content or composition or colour scheme, and I try to incorporate these givens as – let’s say – unconscious rules into the compositions that I make. Of course, you run the risk of being too classical, but this also depends on the references that you choose, of course.

SV: Everything is evolving, so you are in fact adding another chapter.

BAS: Yes. So, basically, from these refer- ences I make a kind of little booklets – there are about five now and they are just for myself to understand certain things, they are not meant to be published or to be made public. They are filled with images that I find out on internet – they are many, many at  my archive – and I organise these images in such a way that I find it an interesting com- position, in how they follow each other up. In the end, you could say, that these booklets with references are some kind of placehold- ers for a real book. This is the little booklet which I made for the Reservoir book – if you open the Reservoir book on the first page, you can imagine that the first three images – so, page one and two and tree of the refer- ence booklet – if you combine them, they somehow become the second picture in the ‘reservoir’ book (future olympic park).

SV: I would like to know a little bit more about your use of colour.

BAS: I don’t think I do a lot to the colour. I understand that most of the pictures have one type of tone or colour, but it’s not that I change it. It’s more that while I am looking for an image part of the reason for photograph- ing something, is because also the light and colour are in a good organisation.

SV: But in the end, they all seem to have a saturation – as in your Dubai photographs – where you can feel the dry atmosphere and the tension and the temperature – and all comes from the colour and not, for instance, of the frame or of other elements.

BAS: I think that the colour is always quite coolish...

SV: How do you control it? Or are you not really conscious of the process?

BAS: I am conscious. I work always with the same person with whom I am printing and I think that makes a big difference. He knows me well and we speak a lot about a certain continuity in the contrast and colour.

SV: So, is the colour a post-production?

BAS: No... at least not by default, there are two ways. While taking the photograph I take care that the colour palette is in my benefit or that it fits the other pictures I’ve already made. And sometimes, it’s just the technique of how you photograph. I think that it’s similar to the way compositions seem to reoccur, you can also search for similar compositions in colour or colour schemes. I think that if the colour is not good, then I don’t even see the image. It’s part of the decision to photograph a place, that the colour should be in sync with the composition. Then, in the end, in the post-production not a lot is done, just the image is made a little bit cooler or maybe the contrast is a little bit adapted. It’s funny, because the first book that I’ve made was in Holland and it has only with grey skies and sandy colours and at a point I would really freak out if there was a little sun and then I couldn’t photograph, it was impossible. And then I went photographing in L.A., Dubai, and those photographs are taken with blaz- ing sunshine, and people are still telling me that even in the pictures of those places it’s is foggy and they don’t realise it’s sunny.

SV: Yes, Reservoir is pretty grey!

BAS: It should be. When the light is tough or hard, and you photograph against the light, you have a limited set of colours, you will always have that idea of a greyish tone. The colours then are in the same tone. They’re never opposing.

SV: Maybe this has also to do with another feature of your work: the idea of surface. Even when you photograph isolated vol- umes that stand in the landscape, they somehow become flat. They are treated like surfaces and not like volumes. For instance, there are some photographers that like to photograph in black & white, because the volumes are accentuated.

BAS: I believe that they are the same in my photographs: volume and landscape naturally belong together. To me, they are the same surface. The only thing is that one is vertical and the other one is horizontal, differences are in the materiality or the colour and that can indicate a three dimensional shape.

SV: What would you say about that relation between surface and volume?

BAS: The surface is not only the ground and volume is not automatically a building or an object. Definitely in a photograph these 2 can act similar, sometimes a volume is suggested while it is not there, and I’m most interested in the fact that in the photograph you can play with these 2 and let them merge or take each others place. Surface to me is where materials are coming together, and then is all about how these materials interact. So both object and landscape are made of surface and those 2 have surfaces that can come together in an interesting way, that they are naturally fitting. I like this idea of naturally fit- ting: things that are believable when they are combined. This is something I would work on when I am photographing or when I am doing post-production, this is important to me. Well, you could say again – what is natural, what is man-made – is somehow put together and in a way you can say surfaces and colours are very important for that.

 

WITH BAS PRINCEN: INSTRUMENTS 

 

WITH BAS PRINCEN: INSTRUMENTS 

BY SUSANA VENTURA

 

SV: How many times do you go to a certain place before shooting it? How do you prepare yourself to enter the place through the picture you are about to shoot?

BAS: I visit a place once. Many people think that you need to scout a place and then return when the light is better... I understand photography in a way that allows me to go further. Things are always evolving. If you go to a place twice, it’s going to be different, and most probably I will be interested in something I did not even see the first time around.

SV: Which instruments do you use for shooting?

BAS: I go with my camera and tripod, but what is more important, is the walking with the camera, the slow movement to find an image is more valuable than the camera itself. This idea of a reference image is also an extremely important instrument in conceiving the image, besides the kind of banal technicality of the camera, the fact that you go with a certain image already in your mind, a kind of a set of possible com- positions and objects and relations, are the most important elements for shooting.

SV: Do you use a digital or an analogue camera?

BAS: At this point, I use a digital Back on a TC, but most the photographs that you know are still made with a Analogue 4 x 5 inch TC. This move to digital, I must admit, changes the way of photographing. So, I am still not used to the digital camera, because I really stopped using the analogue at all, because I thought if I would mix them up, it always would be a fight between one and the other, and it is better to make a clean cut. The two give very different results, with their own character, so the move to digital allows me also to see things new again, and that is what I like a lot, but I miss the big upside down matheglass... The fact that you can see immediately what you’ve made is not always an advantage. Or not an advantage yet, maybe it’s the right way to say it (sic).

SV: You say that after shooting takes place an elimination process. Of course, there is an elimination process that occurs during the shooting when you’re looking for the frame and the distance and the colour, but are there any more elimination processes?

BAS: Of course, there are many elimination processes.

SV: Can you describe them in general terms? What are those processes?

BAS: The first, of course, it’s the shooting, where you go, if you’re there and decide to take the picture or not – this is already quite important – then when you review for the first time the image – on the computer or in the print – that’s the moment where you realise if the picture works outside of its context and, of course, this is what you want. You want the picture to work independently. But somehow at least half of the pictures that I make, that I initially make, when the context is not there, they don’t work anymore which is funny, I even try hard to avoid this context, but sometimes without it, it does not work well. So, in the elimination process, I really look for the images that can stand by themselves or are able to depict a landscape in all its ambiguity without refer- ring to its original. Then, after that, the next process is to see if the image works within the series that you’re making, if they add something, if they compliment 2 previous works for instance, that is ideal. If not, it means that the type of place is good and the idea is good, but the image is not yet there, and then I consider that photograph as a test for an image that still has to be made. So, a lot of times, the elimination process means that there is something in the image that has to be found again, because it doesn’t fit yet completely. In the end, there are not a lot of photographs. But I wouldn’t call it a processes of elimination, and rather prefer to call them processes of combin- ing things that make sense. It’s really about finding connections between previously made images and the new ones. If they are completely on their own, without referring to other photographs, there’s no reason to use them.

SV: Finally, what makes you reject a photograph?

BAS: I really have to print them out to decide if they’re good or not. I can’t do it on the screen. And I ask other people to see if the photograph can stands on itself, and how they perceive the image, what it tells them. I don’t trust me, because I know too much about the actual place, if any of these parameters are not met, then I slowly work onward on the same idea, but I just don’t use that particular images.

SV: But do you do photoshop or not?

BAS: Of course, there’s no way around it. If you start to work with these new digital cameras, the image that comes out is so rough that it’s not a useful image. So, you have to use it. You cannot just print that file, otherwise it will look like soft and without depth. In the end, it’s like a negative, it still has to go through a process of making. It’s the same: you cannot show a negative neither. So, you need to use photoshop or any other program in order to have at least one round of determining how the image should be. And then you have to print it and when it’s printed somehow you’re able to see if the image can stand on its own and can become a work on itself.

 

WITH BAS PRINCEN: DESIRE

 

WITH BAS PRINCEN: DESIRE 

BY SUSANA VENTURA

We present an informal exchange of ideas about Bas Princen’s photographs resulting from several conversations. It is divided into three chapters: a first about desire or what makes an image come into being, a second dedicated to composition or about the photographs as autonomous lived spaces and works of art and then a third and last chapter about the instruments and the techniques as modes of connection between the photographer, the camera, the reality and the real that the photograph creates and presents.

SV: A first and basic question: your main education is in architecture (you’ve graduated from the Berlage Institute in Rotterdam), but your main occupation is photography and architectural photography in particular. What drove you into photogra- phy and how did architecture play a role?

BAS: To me it’s not about document at all. It’s about something completely different even though things might look very straightforward that I photograph or very banal how they are photographed, that’s not the intention...

SV: So, what drove you into photography or when did you decided to become a photog- rapher instead of an architect?

BAS: You don’t decide it. This is the funny thing, of course.That’s something that happens. But you could say that there were some ingredients that made it happen. When I was studying at The Design Academy at the time I was there it was called Academy for Industrial Design, I was there or I went there in order to start to design things – well, that was the intention...

SV: But you are still designing things...

BAS: Not really, not anymore, but for instance, when I am teaching, I am teaching architecture, and not photography, so there is quite a lot... I know quite a lot about it, I follow it up, I know what is going on in the world of design and architecture more in architecture than in design – and somehow I use that in my photography, but I don’t practice anymore.  It’s a different occupation and you need to have other different skills and sensibilities.

SV: Yes, but what I was saying is that you are still designing in the space of the photograph, because you’re designing, constructing and fabricating landscape and buildings in the space of the photograph. What lives in the space of a photograph of yours doesn’t exist exactly in reality. There are several techniques that allow you to play with the reality and that make a photograph a construction, a way of seeing things, of seeing light, of seeing volume, of seeing colour... In the end, you’re designing. In architecture, you deal also with light, volumes, colour, empty space, mass...

BAS: You could say that, in The Design Acad- emy, there were a couple of things that set it off, several ingredients of which one was a very strange course that was called – it was in the first year – it was called “Optical Grammar Studies”.

SV: It is quite unusual!

BAS: Yes, it’s quite unusual. It was a course in which you had to start to understand how to organize a piece of paper on which you had to add a certain amount of lines or points, in a way you had to reorganize it. It was super abstract, you never knew if you were doing it right or wrong, because basically it involved putting three dots or a hundred dots... And after a while, you intuitively apply certain rules to follow up one decision after the other. I don’t know if you understand what I am talk- ing about...

SV: Perfectly! It’s a very Bauhaus way of teaching!

 

WITH HÉLÈNE BINET: THE PURE SENSATION OF PHOTOGRAPHY PART II

 

WITH HÉLÈNE BINET: THE PURE SENSATION OF PHOTOGRAPHY PART II

BY SUSANA VENTURA

SV: Taking into account that you may always look at Peter Zumthor’s work with a given frame and an aperture in your mind, how would you describe its perception first as an inhabitant?

HB: It is difficult for me to be in a Zumthor’s building without thinking about my work. Even if I would like to be simply an inhabitant, there is a part of my mind that I cannot control completely, which is aware of the fact that I am a photographer. I think I cannot distinguish the approach of “Hélène Binet, the photographer” from the one of “Hélène Binet, the inhabitant”. In my first visit I like to be able to do something that is not related to my activity as a photographer. While you are doing this activity, there is another part of the brain perceiving information about the surroundings and, as a consequence, the soul of the building comes to you. The result of those perceptions is very valuable for the understanding of a place. But, of course, I also need to have a rational approach by looking at drawings or discussing issues with the architects.

SV: Peter Zumthor says that “we perceive atmosphere through our emotional sensibility - a form of perception that works incredibly quickly”, because “we are capable of immediate appreciation, of a spontaneous emotional response, of rejecting things in a flash”. Still bearing in mind that you are an inhabitant of a Peter Zumthor’s work, how would you describe its impact on you?

HB: All the buildings I visited, I knew I was going to photograph them beforehand, so I could not just sit there and enjoy and feel the atmosphere completely. But I would say that to really understand a place I actually need time, because I do understand a lot through the light and the light is different on the surfaces or in the room in each and every second of the day. I am not able to pass judgement or express appreciation very quickly because I like to see the building as something alive that changes. I think the cycle of the day is very important to get closer to a building.

SV: Yes and your photographs are a reflection of that; as if light was their first material.

HB: Yes, we see the world because of the light and it is difficult to disentangle the complicated relationship between the light, the object that receives it and the surrounding atmosphere. The work of a photographer is to capture the light. If I am to photograph a space, I am not interested in one perfect image or one iconic image, but in the way the space responds to different lights and in analysing how each situ- ation creates a different world. If you have different lights, you have different pictures and you see that there is no single representation of something, one experience that you might say, “this is the building”.

SV: Then, you take a walk, as you say: as “an unconscious act of seeing”. Why is it “unconscious”? What do you think or believe that it is at stake when you wander around the place and the space?

HB: I don’t know exactly in which occasion I used the expression “unconscious act of seeing” but, of course, there are very different moments when you walk through space and it is about the approach I mentioned before, to do something, to allow, no to look in a rational way, but to be looked up by the building, let’s say. And then there is the walk when you walk from point A to point B and somehow what you see is unfolding. Every time you walk there is something appearing or disappearing and, then, by the end of the walk, you have seen many different situations. When you are at the end of the walk, at point B, you will be confronted with one view, one image, but you also remember all the other images and this moment of layering is very important for perception itself. The building is so complex as an experience. As you know, when you are in a space all your senses are involved in perception. All your senses are working: you can smell, you can be cold, you can move, you can hear, you can remember, you can imagine the plan of the building. It is very complex and a photograph is very simple. It is better not to compete with the complexity of the percep- tion of architecture. An image has to be simple and direct. It has to be able to create an atmosphere and to drown you in it and per- haps to remind you of something else.

SV: What is the role of desire in your work?

HB: What is the first reason to do the photo- graph? I think it is an interesting question and, somehow, it is the same for every artist, be it a musician or an artist, a photographer or an architect. At the end, maybe we are all quite romantic and there is a very strong relationship with the world that surrounds us, and we have the desire to identify ourselves with it and maybe to appropriate it. I mean, art and photography are a strong way to appropriate the world. In photography, you frame it and you control it and then it becomes yours. The desire to produce an image is about this tension between our feelings and landscape (or architecture, which is just another form of landscape).

SV: Is there any kind of previous knowledge about the work you are going to shoot, such as a conversation with Peter Zumthor about the ideas or emotions that have been pre- sent in the work from the beginning?

HB: When I work with an architect I try to look at the concept of his/ her work and also to understand his/ her sensibility. And I try

to understand the first reason for a concept, what is behind the initial idea but can still be perceived in a building. With Peter Zumthor, there is not a lot of verbal exchange. It is up to me to be perceptive and ready to capture what sort of photograph is appropriate for his work.

SV: What do you mean when you say you were only able to photograph the Thermal Baths of Vals after diving into the water?

HB: You have to become part of the building to fully photograph it. In that case, in the Thermal Baths, I see the water as one of the building materials. It is maybe light and stone and water. So, you cannot enter this building without swimming... It would be like not walking in the place and merely looking at it through a window. You need that full experience to be able to realise why he made some choices and, of course, it is also unique, because there is no other building typology where the material is something that you can feel in your body in the same way. Normally, you can touch it; see if it is comfortable or if it is cold... In that case, you can really be part of the building physically and that is quite unique, of course.

 

WITH HÉLÈNE BINET: THE PURE SENSATION OF PHOTOGRAPHY_PART II

 

WITH HÉLÈNE BINET: THE PURE SENSATION OF PHOTOGRAPHY_PART II

BY SUSANA VENTURA

SV: When Peter Zumthor explains his idea of “atmosphere”, he gives as an example the photographs that he loves and make him wonder about his ability to design places such as those represented in the photographs. He is looking for a kind of sensation represented in the photograph and we must be aware of the fact that he has never seen one of the buildings and that he is enchanted with a mood that he cannot find anymore on the other one. However, both examples make him desire and pursue those sensations he describes. In your opinion, can photography represent the feeling of an architectural work? Or does photography capture a sensation that does not belong to the architectural work, but lives merely in the plane of the photograph composition, even if that photograph is faithful to the architectural work? Or is it the same sensation, the feeling of belonging to the architectural work that passes through the photograph?

HB: The way I work, I am interested in sublimating the sensation that belongs to architecture. And that brings me to ask myself: Can photography represent a sensation? Yes. If not, it will be not photography. Of course, architecture photography can be seen as a very strict and hard discipline. Sometimes people ask me: “What do you do with photography?” and I answer: “Architecture”. And they say: “Oh!” They think it’s a very unemotional form of expression. But it isn’t. The reason I like to photograph architecture is because I feel that photographing spaces and objects is a way of telling stories that belong to a specific environment. I need them like a musician needs a score. Somehow the camera is a little like an instrument and architecture is the score. You may say that sounds and stories are always very subjective. The camera plays something but someone else has been writing it, has been putting the notes and the harmony together. We need this score... but I’m still doing the sounds, so, it’s a very tight relationship. I need the harmony that was written by somebody else and someone else needs my sensibility to put it together, so there’s no way they exist without each other. I mean, of course, architecture can be visited, but I’m talking about architecture photography. In architecture photography we need to be quite reduced and this is why I like details in B&W. I think Aristotle said “We hear better in the dark”. If our senses are reduced; if we only have one sense available, we may be very impressed, or very concentrated, or hear better.

SV: In the act of creation what allows you to direct yourself towards a certain photograph? Or what makes you decide for a certain frame or angle or a certain luminosity or aperture instead of another?

HB: I think every building is different. I cannot really set a rule and apply it to every building. I think the artist looks at the space and then set the rules. When I frame a building I look for my little inside stories, of course, to decide how to look at the building, but they are never the same.

SV: Can you give some examples?

HB: When I was photographing the Brüder Klaus Kapelle, which is a very good piece of work and is also photogenic and accessible, you see a nice photograph of the place in every way. The landscape around it is also so beautiful and you don’t have to deal with street lights or trucks. I decided not to do any photos at the time of the opening. I wasn’t interested in photographing for the news, but I wanted to tell my story. I went there after one year, when the kapelle was already well known. I thought: “This is a small tool - this kapelle – that is able to connect you with something very big”. If you are religious, it is a God; if you are a thinker, you will want to understand the sky and the stars. So, in all of the photographs I tried to connect you with the firmament. So, there is a series of photos where the clouds somehow become part of the building and there is another series where I am looking up. Then, there is a photo which was made at night using a very long exposure, so the stars move and become a single line and, because the earth moves, they become one circle. So, you are really connected with the wide movement of the planet.

 

WITH ESZTER STEIERHOFFER: UNFRAMING#1_ARCHITECTURE

 

WITH ESZTER STEIERHOFFER: UNFRAMING#1_ARCHITECTURE

BY INÊS MOREIRA

INÊS MOREIRA: Eszter, we have started a conversation some time ago about the ways in which “curating architecture” is conceptualized and practiced so diversely. We have focused on traditionally existing disciplinary disagreements about curating, which can be easily understood and exposed, if we confront art history and architectural backgrounds, as yours and mine. Our dialogues have revolved around joint interests in spatial, urban and experimental art and architectural practices, and it is deeply informed by our curatorial practices and our on-going processes of PhD research. So, to publish our thoughts in a shared article is a way to pull out some conclusions in the form of an informal discussion. However, before we stabilize our knowledges, I immediately propose a twist… instead of exploring the expected divergences and discrepancies of disciplinary practices… I propose thinking of “curating architecture” from a more abstract notion of “unframing”. Notions as framing, capturing, and freezing in a surface, or the bi-dimensionality of a captured image, are central to photography and other bi-dimensional representations of architecture, and, therefore, become central gestures of most architectural exhibitions and to a substantial part of practices “curating architecture”. I am interested in curating as a practice disturbing the ways we see, understand and, above all, the modes in which we know architecture. This position is both informed by interdisciplinary theoretical research and by certain contemporary [art] curatorial practices which underline critical positions and produce active spaces. I believe the notion of Unframing can bring enmeshment and complexity back to the act of depiction in architecture. If depicting, as a curatorial gesture, is a procedure clarifying, framing and delimitating an object, unframing would produce disturbance, focusing simultaneously on the backgrounds, the externalities and the offstage, or to consider the pluri-dimensionality of that which is outside the central focus of a picture. So, what I am proposing is to jointly think if “unframing” can constitute a mode of curating architecture, beyond representation?

ESZTER STEIERHOFFER: ‘Cura‘, the origin of the word curating means taking care or healing, putting back together. One would think about curating conventionally as linking/putting together, orchestrating, engineering or even as building or facilitating and contextualizing – framing in a way. In contrast, your concept of curating as unframing addresses the fundamental problems of focus and definition; your method of producing disturbances reminds me of experimental tools of the avant-garde. The situationist practices for example used chance and chaos to re-introduce complexity in the perception of urban space and reading of architecture. ‘Unframing’ however in relation to curating architecture is also concerned with the problems of the media and display of architecture, which go far beyond simple formal or practical questions of the exhibition making. As most of the times it is impossible to present a building (in its physical reality) within the museum, it is even more difficult to reproduce or translate its surrounding urban context, meaning and signifiers; and the question remains: if in our everyday life we are all (inevitably) subjects of and to architecture, what is its object, or where and how architecture presents itself? If framing and capturing can be described as representation in contrast of pure presentation, I’d like to think about unframing as a search for architecture – an impossible mission in a way... In relation to the drastic boom of international temporary exhibitions there is a significant change in the media (and representation) of architecture - described also as an interdisciplinary space in-between contemporary art practices and architecture. This shift can be noticed even in the case of mainstream architecture exhibitions like the Venice Biennale: the last two editions were focused on the cities and experimental architecture, this year Kazuyo Sejima put emphasis on inviting contemporary artists to participate. Whereas in the museum or gallery an architectural structure (the edifice) provides the infrastructure for showing art, the situation here is reversed: artworks provide the structure to open up and exhibit or reinvent architecture, in a way art becomes the ‘stage’ for architecture.

IM: You are reversing the roles of container and content, suggesting art and spatial installations as a curatorial approach to architectural space… instead of architectural space as a support for art works…

ES: In my research I am interested how certain contemporary art practices like installation art, performance and time based media can be compared or differentiated with architecture as object, medium, experience and environment. I am researching interpretative possibilities for exhibiting architecture by reversing conventional perspectives of site-specific curating, public art commissions and ‘scattered-site exhibitions’. I am also interested in site specific curating, where art is decoding and revealing or activating architecture ‘on site’. This is what I described as staging and you as unframing - I think. Could you maybe give an example?

IM: I will have to be more precise: to understand what I am calling Unframing it is essential to consider the non-representational dimensions of architecture and space. Unframing would proceed by referring the non-representational, whether experiential, phantasmatic, or even aural resonances of space and the architectural. This is what we have explored collectively in a project I curated at the burnt aisle of the Rectorate of the University of Oporto, an (architectural) building curated after an accidental fire. The exhibition-project is an essay with/through/about the space and materiality of a building, about contingency, emptiness and reverberation. In other words, it approaches presences and absences in architectural space. This project is a practical example; the architectural remnants were curated through artist’s installation works: art explored the spatial and material resonances of space, and, together with the building (as a set), the project has curated architecture. Curating is understood as the enactment of space, sometimes through artists work.

ES: So, in a way you describe artistic practices that deal with the notion of space as curatorial gestures?

IM: Not exactly… although some creative spatial practices can be understood as curatorial gestures, I am referring to artistic practices set in collaboration with a curator / architect. Curating as a collaborative spatial practice in which artist are invited to participate. This is a very particular position, not all art practices dealing with space are “curatorial” and it’s not my intention to generalize… My background education as an architect and a practice designing exhibition spaces – installation, set or scenography – is fundamental to understand this particular approach to curating. “Aftermath and Resonance!” project exhibited and interpreted architectural spaces: room, contents, mediation were part of the same concept. Other experiments have been exploring this unframing gesture, the exhibition project “Burn it or not?” at Ataturk Cultural Center (AKM) in Istanbul Biennial 2007 dealt with an existing architecture building from a similar perspective: artists´ work (installation, photography, sound, and video) was invited and installed in the building to think of architecture: the exhibition considered the particularities of the AKM building where it was installed, questioning the modernist politics of its foundation, and its future to come as a structure, whether to be demolished, remodeled or maintained. The response didn´t come from architectural design, as most architecture exhibitions do. The modernist and exuberant building was appropriated, undoing all exhibition conventions of white cube and black box, and notions of technical representation and the endowment of the architect. The sound installation Memories On Silent Walls, by Erdem Helvacioglu, interfered with AKM architecture bringing in the exterior square of Taxim and playing the memories of political moment of Turkish contemporaneity. Both Oporto and Istanbul projects, different in scale and visibility, were experimenting with architecture as an exhibition space, architecture as an autonomous building, the collective memory built through architecture, the resonances of architectural void, a mode of curating architecture by unframing it…. I believe there is something in common with your new project, can you tell us about the project you are developing in a building in Budapest? How can site-specific art produce modes of curating architecture?

ES: It is interesting that you mentioned the “Burn it or not?” exhibition at Ataturk Cultural Center which both of us have seen separately and regard as an important point of reference, one example of our shared inspirations, while there is also a clear difference in our methodology and its interpretation. This might stem from our different backgrounds as you already pointed this out in your introduction. ... but in your question you referred to an exhibition which is still a work in progress, curated collaboratively with Judit Angel, art historian and curator of Kunsthalle Budapest. The exhibition will take place in Ernst Museum and will consider the building of that museum itself. The Art Nouveau style building of the Ernst Museum was originally built in 1912 to host a private collection, a small cinema and a few private flats and artists’ studios. The building went through several physical, formal and functional changes and today functions as a public gallery of temporary exhibitions dedicated to contemporary art. It is not only an interesting historical artifact, but also an important landmark in the Budapest art scene and cultural life. The exhibition focuses on the relation between space, history, vision and architecture, on the phenomenology and analytics of perception as well as on issues related to space / architecture and its representation. Participants come from the field of visual arts, architecture, design and film-making, works include site specific commissions as well as others are linked more implicitly to Ernst Museum and focus on broader problems related to the architectural object and its interpretation. The exhibition is conceived on three levels: site-specific interventions, film projections and a theoretical section. We are working with the title ‚Related Spaces‘ which is a reference to interdisciplinary relation between architec­ture and other art practices, the interrelated discursive fields surrounding architectural issues. With this exhibition we wish to enable new perspectives on the Ernst Museum as well as different understanding of the relationship between visual art and architecture.

see the intire interview in scopiomagazine aboveground: architecture

 

WITH BEATRICE GALILEE: UNFRAMING #2_CITY

 

WITH BEATRICE GALILEE: UNFRAMING #2_CITY

BY MARIANA PESTANA

MARIANA PESTANA: Our last conversation was built around architectural criticism and its expressions in the form of writing and curating. We talked about behavioural codes and informality and how that influences the way people relate to spaces and their programme. We shared experiences in architecture and our common belief in interdisciplinary practice. Lastly, we spoke about objects and their ability to convey messages and exert criticism.

As you know, I am interested in architecture’s potential of using its very language to communicate. I have been conducting experiences accordingly, combining architecture curation with a careful choice and manipulation of the space where it happens. An example of this is ‘Pub Talk: spatial settings to eat and drink’, a conference we (DE Magazine) organised with MA&DE (with Paulo Moreira) at London Met last month. There, a group of young practitioners from different disciplines presented projects on eating and drinking, themes that I have identified as the key ingredients to start a good conversation. The fact that this talk happened in a pub (The Bailey) intended not only to test the influence of spatial background in the development of the conversations but also to grant informality to them. The pub is historically a place of encounters and exchange of ideas, thus we aimed to situate the talk between an organised event and a spontaneous evening at the pub where people came but not necessarily because there was a talk happening.

BEATRICE GALILEE: I love the idea behind Pub Talks.
When I consider the best conversations I’ve had about architecture, they have been on long tube journeys across London or over the eat on a late-night easyJet flights. It’s when I’m stuck in queues, traffic jams, stranded by weather or ending up on the wrong vaporetto that ideas and connections happen. The Venice Biennale is a fantastic thing but only rarely do I return to London inspired by what I’ve seen. For me, the loosening of the mind and flashes of inspiration rarely happen when the dictaphone is running.
I’m interested in how the conversations in The Bailey went. Did highlighting the spontaneity of the space put it under too much scrutiny? Did it perform? By promoting the conversations on a poster and organizing a time and providing an expecting audience affect the flow of a pub conversation you were aspiring to? Did the discussion take on a different tone and nature? Or did the space maintain its informality?

MP: Well, during the presentations I wouldn’t say that being at the pub was any different than at a conference room, except for the moment where James Gilpin offered a sip of his Export Whisky… this wouldn’t happen so naturally in a conference room. Thus, the most interesting moment was the conversation after the presentations, moderated by David Khon. There, everyone was sitting on the sofas and all over the floor. The conversation was very long and vivacious, to the point that people were fighting over the microphone as everyone wanted to talk at the same time…so, it was quite informal. Then the conversation continued outside as the pub had closed. I would argue that there was an informality that is not common to this sort of events! During the conversation, the dominant theme was speculation, the building of fictional scenarios and the narratives conveyed through architecture. Then it inevitably fell into a self-reflection around the fact that we were in a pub, talking about pubs, drinks and food. David Knight mentioned that the most interesting conversation about architecture he had ever had was at a pub and that epic conversations are often triggered by the consumption of alcohol.
Hans Ulrich Obrist once said that the more intersting moments of a conference are those immediately before and after it happens, where people meet and share ideas.
Could you tell me about your project space ‘The Gopher Hole’, which is in itself a place between a bar and an architecture gallery, and how the fact that you now operate within a specific place is generating a community around it?

BG: We’ve had a few debates at "e Gopher Hole and I’ve always felt that the conversations before and afterwards are what make the event worthwhile. We had a talk on critical futures in architecture and nearly every professional architecture writer in London was in the room. "at kind of cross-fertilsation is what makes our space valuable. We hope it’s going to be the kind of place where interesting people meet and plans are hatched. In the weeks before we opened I met Kyong Park, the founder of Storefront for Art and Architecture, in Seoul. He told me that the social aspect of Storefront always trumped its exhibitions and events. It was primarily a social club, a convergence of people and ideas, and that’s why it still maintains itself as such a huge presence, despite being pretty puny in size.

The Gopher Hole is a project I am running with aberrant archite!ure. As a group we want to explore ideas in contemporary culture and to provide a platform for others to do that too. It’s not an architecture gallery – I find that idea a bit perverse. The two words don’t belong together at all. But, like you, we do have an intrinsic interest in architecture as a medium. There is a lot of discussion and debate about curating architecture at the moment but essentially our space is circumnavigating it by being as open as possible to ideas. We had a TEDx conference streaming content directly from Ramallah at the weekend and we had speakers from the Russell Tribunal as well as some incredibly moving speeches about the situation in Palestine. What’s more, we can host a Pecha Kucha on young archite!s; we are having band nights and hosting dinner parties. By removing ourselves from ideology and not associating with one dogma or another, we are free to be a platform for other people’s ideas.The Gopher Hole is essentially a political idea – it is a nickname given to the informal tunnels that are dug beneath the Mexican/US border and used to smuggle people and goods. While there are other more playful connotations (we are in the basement of a Mexican restaurant; we are spontaneous and informal; we are totally independent) we do take that notion of interstitial spaces of under-the-radar and not officially sanctioned quite healthily. We definitely share an enthusiasm for this kind of interdisciplinary collaborations – who do you work with and why?

MP: It is true that there is a certain amnesia threat to exhibitions. Unlike texts, to which one can always return to, exhibitions live only in a very particular time and spatial frame. However, I strongly believe in the power of intuitive, nonverbal communication, and despite working as a writer as well, I feel more inclined towards a form of criticism that operates beyond the textual, verbal outline. Exhibitions are spatial for a finite period in time but the physical objects displayed – pieces – have the potential to evoke experiences from the past or to suggest ideas for the future. In that sense, they transcend the time and space of the exhibition in itself. Furthermore, the use of analogies, metaphors and allegory are processes of highlighting dimensions that usually remain under the shadow of slightly more linear or limited approaches. Therefore, I’ve been working with different mediums, from photography to jewellery design, allowing the audience to interpret, question and take a position, exploring the potential of the exhibited material to evoke ideas beyond the very object on display. Different people look at different aspects and qualities of the objects. This is very valuable for me and less likely to happen with a written piece, where it seems to be easier to persuade the audience to agree with your opinion. Perhaps more than text pieces, are objects open to interpretation?

 

ORO ROSSO

 

ORO ROSSO

 BY MICHELA FRONTINO

5 am. Thousands of seasonal workers leave their ghettos to reach Daunia lands, a district nearby Foggia in South Italy, where they normally spend 12 hours a day working in the fields to fill up an average of 10 to 12 harvest bin of tomatoes. They are paid accordingly to their productivity: € 3 per harvest bin which normally weights 300 Kilos. At the end of the day they get € 36 gross pay, minus the cost for the transport to the fields. They are offered a packed lunch for € 2, 50 for a sandwich and a tuna can. It turns out that agricultural workers in the South of Italy are around 80.000, a number that is constantly increasing. They arrive in Italy to look for accommodation and a job in order to send money to their relatives. They end up becoming enslaved workers with no chance of changing their condition, instead. They emigrate from Morocco, Tunis, Togo, Mali, Burkina Faso, Senegal, Poland, Romania, Albania, to find place in a warehouse in the country side, far from the surrounding cities. They wait there hoping that the farm employers “caporali” call them to work, even for just one day and with no guaranteed salary. Enslaved workers live in strenuous conditions, with no drinkable water, electricity or toilet facilities, forcing them to go outside for their basic needs. They are not provided with health assistance or fundamental civil or labour right. As the warehouse gets overcrowded, many share the same bed sleeping on a mattress or on the floor. With no access to water, they are forced to walk long distances to get the nearest irrigation sites or public fountains.

The “Oro Rosso” (Red Gold) project has been realized in the fields of the small towns of Cerignola, Candela, San Severo. In the Rigno Scalo ghetto, the author met migrants living in unsustainable conditions, social exclusion and vulnerable to violence and intolerance. Migrants packed in wooden barracks, built with reused materials, or in unfinished old colonial houses, where the walls are precarious and partly destroyed. These are their homes, as far from the cultural and social integration ideal as they seem surreal.

 

STRATIFICATIONS

 

STRATIFICATIONS

BY CRISTINA CORAL

 

My father was a composer, music has always been a very important part of my life. After graduation and several and different work experience I have chosen the camera as my main artistic expression.My approach to photography and its development was almost entirely self-taught. After having attended a workshop I immediately understood what the camera could have given me in terms of experimentation and discovery of the world around me and more over of myself. Photographing has become an imperative language.
Amongst my recognitions are: Two gold medals in the category Portraiture and other at the PX3 Prix de la Photographie Paris 2014; Honorable Mention at IPA International Photography Award 2014 in the category Fine Art Portraiture;Honorable Mention at PX3 Paris 2015.
My work has been exhibited for some events of Vogue Italia, at Convivio, at Circus Gallery at Carla Sozzani Gallery.
Many of my pictures have been featured as ''photo of the day ''on Vogue.it. and published in many magazines on line as The Huffington Post De., Pizza digitale,Phinest, Art and Fact, Vectro Ave N.Y, Lenscratch, Posi+tive, Artwort, Jungle Magazine U.K, Forth Magazine L.A, Anormalmag Spain, Ignant De., Juliet Art Magazine, Uploadyourtalent,LÓeil, Worbz,Rai News Blog, SFMoMa Blog,NikonSguardi ,Seeance Magazine Berlin...
My project ''This living hand'' , ''Hidden beauty'' and ''Do not disturb'' have been published on Lens Culture and Some of my photos are represented by the agency Art and Commerce of New York.

synopsis
Time has its forms of beauty, but as in nature also in the men stratified sediments of emotions and thoughts.
Seaweed, sand, wood sprigs,blades of grass like layers of states of mind.

 
editor's note
The presented project was selected from a spontaneous submission made by Cristina Coral.

 

PROMISED LAND

 

PROMISED LAND

BY MICHAŁ KONRAD

 

Michał Konrad (birth name Michał Smuda) Polish photographer born in 1983, living in Wodzisław Slaski. From an early age, interested in visual art.

The main subject of his photography is man. In his work he concentrates primarily on the psychological sphere. It shows how a person perceives the environment in the modern world and how the environment affects him. His visions often have a surreal character, balancing on the border of dream and imagination. His photographs are self-portraits.

He is the author of several photographic cycles.

His works include: Transition, september 2016.; Promised land, january 2017; Amnesia, february 2017.; Butterfly, march 2017; Insomnia, july 2017.

His photographs were presented at individual and collective exhibitions. They have been published in Polish and foreign magazines, the most important of which are: „Pokochajfotografie”, „Kwartalnik literacki Szafa”, „Seventres”, „Dodho”, „Scopio Network”, „DpiMag”, „Visionary”, „F-stop”, „Monovision”,”Black”, "LoosenArt".In 2017 he was selected as one of the twenty most talented Polish photographers, DEBUTS project.

URL:  http://michalkonrad.allyou.net


Synopsis


I run in my thoughts, in my head.
Forest silence, then scream.
The influx of false thoughts.
I am looking for one true thought.
Which will let me fall asleep on time.

The title "Insomnia" shows the anxiety in the modern world, caused by lies. The era in which we live is called energy. As far as man is concerned, it means his constant excitement.
Lots of information that constantly stimulate my brain. Ask yourself the question that is true and which is false? Where is the boundary between fiction and reality? Maybe I'm not real either? Maybe I'm not here? Maybe I just think I'm!
Insomnia is an attempt to show man in the world of manipulation. Lost among pervasive falsehood.

Insomnia is my fifth cycle, its ending is equal to one year from the start of my work with self-portrait. Soon I will start working on a project that will include all my cycles. The theme of the project will be "Identity", which I would like to finish with the release of the book version of the album.

April - July 2017

 

PHILOSOPHERS

 

PHILOSOPHERS

BY CATRINE VAL

 

Catrine Val was born in Cologne (Germany), and started out her career in Vienna (Austria) working in the field of advertising, as a commercial artist. She finished her BA at the Art Academy in Kassel (Germany). She also attended a post-graduate studies at the Kunsthochschule für Medien, in Cologne. She worked for 6 years as an assistant lecturer to Bjørn Melhus at the Art Academy in Kassel, in the field of virtual reality, where she further developed her artistic position.

"Philosophers,

Our times are afflicted by a flood of narcissism, and an obsessive cult of self-expression. Visually building upon “Philosophers”, I examine the loss of connection to nature in our modern, technically driven world, in which nature has become a strange terrain. The longing for nature as a fixed reference point and the wishful thinking of an intact romantic worldview in which man and nature are in harmony, is facing an accelerating clock in our fully mechanized age. Art’s task changes in a world suffused with generated images. It is imperative to reflect on what are often highly sensitively charged worlds of images, the ways they are represented. In our constant rapid time modern life has become far-removed from anything resembling authenticity or truth. The relationships between nature and technology, language and body, body and space, have changed rapidly. The order of the day is to understand the world from the vantage point of abstraction and not to abstract from the world. In our post internet society ,they have altered the way we regard communication and identity, character and  our own selves and femininity . Man is the only living species that can transmit and expand his store of knowledge from generation to generation; but such transmission requires a process of thought on the part of the individual recipients. The entire way, we approach the world has changed. In historical sense Philosophy claimed to provide a rigorous method to search for the meaning of life, and it was a precious substitute for dogmatic religion. But in modern times, religion among the educated classes in Europe and North America has lost ground, and intellectuals are neglecting the basic human need to find answers. Philosophy has shrunk in reputation and stature. “Philosophers” as one oeuvre is itself an open system: it employs transformations, mirror images, doublings and replications to develop realist fictions that amaze and surprise the beholder and raise questions concerning functional contexts as well as ideas of value.

In this  modern western society women are rarely find in inhabiting a highly austere, analytical space, such as the one which philosophy involves. Slowly but still not globally, the opportunities are changing for better. Women have at last gained access to higher education, what they can achieve in the fields where men have distinguished themselves, above all in philosophy is still vulnerable, reacting at the margin areas of contemporary philosophy  and speculative thoughts.

The genre of philosophy flourishing literately arises within the framework of a new need and frankness on the quest for the meaning of life. This is the highly influential age of the Internet in which we are constantly flooded by information in fragments. Each person at the computer is embarked on a quest for and fabrication of his or her identity. The web mimics human neurology, and it is fundamentally altering young people's brains. The web, for good or ill, is instantaneous. Philosophy belongs to a vanished age of much slower and rhetorically formal inquiry.

By referring to the external visual similarities of historical and current philosophers and the characteristics of their work, a reference to the historical philosopher, which incorporates his life and work, is made. As a contemporary interpretation of traditional philosophic thinking, “Philosophers” takes advantage of the iconographic approach of current media discourse. “Philosophers” as one oeuvre is itself an open system: it employs transformations, mirror images, doublings and replications to develop realist fictions that amaze and surprise the beholder and raise questions concerning functional contexts as well as ideas of value. It exposes the effects of individualism and technicality on modern man's position within his natural environment. “Philosophers” brings together different approaches in ideas and longings, which in their own way all aim to go beyond modern and postmodern thinking. The concept of "philosophers" quest for a new terminology and a new grammar of thinking about contemporary art and focus on new meaning of vision and gender."

 

INSOMNIA

 

INSOMNIA

BY MICHAŁ KONRAD

 

Michał Konrad (birth name Michał Smuda) Polish photographer born in 1983, living in Wodzisław Slaski. From an early age, interested in visual art.

The main subject of his photography is man. In his work he concentrates primarily on the psychological sphere. It shows how a person perceives the environment in the modern world and how the environment affects him. His visions often have a surreal character, balancing on the border of dream and imagination. His photographs are self-portraits.

He is the author of several photographic cycles.

His works include: Transition, september 2016.; Promised land, january 2017; Amnesia, february 2017.; Butterfly, march 2017; Insomnia, july 2017.

His photographs were presented at individual and collective exhibitions. They have been published in Polish and foreign magazines, the most important of which are: „Pokochajfotografie”, „Kwartalnik literacki Szafa”, „Seventres”, „Dodho”, „Scopio Network”, „DpiMag”, „Visionary”, „F-stop”, „Monovision”,”Black”, "LoosenArt".In 2017 he was selected as one of the twenty most talented Polish photographers, DEBUTS project.

URL:  http://michalkonrad.allyou.net


Synopsis
I run in my thoughts, in my head.
Forest silence, then scream.
The influx of false thoughts.
I am looking for one true thought.
Which will let me fall asleep on time.

The title "Insomnia" shows the anxiety in the modern world, caused by lies. The era in which we live is called energy. As far as man is concerned, it means his constant excitement.
Lots of information that constantly stimulate my brain. Ask yourself the question that is true and which is false? Where is the boundary between fiction and reality? Maybe I'm not real either? Maybe I'm not here? Maybe I just think I'm!
Insomnia is an attempt to show man in the world of manipulation. Lost among pervasive falsehood.

Insomnia is my fifth cycle, its ending is equal to one year from the start of my work with self-portrait. Soon I will start working on a project that will include all my cycles. The theme of the project will be "Identity", which I would like to finish with the release of the book version of the album.

April - July 2017

 

THE ONES WE LOVE

 

THE ONES WE LOVE

BY ELISE BOULARAN

 

“I’m one of those people who, no doubt out of modesty, don’t externalize their feelings publicly. Especially when it’s about my roots, the important people of my life. Except maybe through pictures. I can tell you that they teach me what love really is.”

Work In Progress

 

CRYSTAL IDENTITY

 

CRYSTAL IDENTITY

BY AGNIESZKA GOTOWALA

 

"Crystal Identity” is long-term ongoing project. I started the researches and basic realizations in 2017. I decided to work on it when I realized that for a long time I was feeling that I existed only in the face of nature. Towards nature, I’ve felt like I was making revisits. Photography has become part of the act of action. And the landscapes and their character have become the witnesses of what happens in the space. I started to look for the "in situ” places, where there appear sublte union, indirectly related to refuge. Allegedly nature was supposed to release alienation.

It’s a tractate on apperception and becoming the part of. I’m inclined to reach out to the invisible and undermine that what is invisible does not exist. I nurture the fragments of nature, traces it contains as the carriers of memory, archetypes. I penetrate those unobvious resources of nature, that are never deprived of its identity. I explore dependences between subconsciousness and memory, traces recalling the past events, which are a memorial as proof of what is hidden. I take the journey to search for identity, balance, roots embedded without the context of time and space.

ABOUT THE AUTOR: 

I’m multidisciplinary artist from Poland, I work within the visual and performance arts. I focus on the processes of the research, exploration and transformation in the fields of human states and nature, and the memory and identity they contain. My artworks have been presented and published in Poland and abroad. I graduated from Photography at the department of Multimedia at the University of Fine Art in Poznan, Poland, and earlier, also from Technical Physics at the University of Technology in Wroclaw, Poland. I practice Butoh.  

 

Website: www.agnieszkagotowala.com

 

WALL ABSTRACTS

 

WALL ABSTRACTS

BY KIP HARRIS

 

Kip Harris is a retired architect with degrees in English literature, humanities, and architecture. For nearly 30 years, he was a principal of FFKR Architects in Salt Lake City, Utah focusing on university / K-12 school buildings and Native American gaming projects. The last of these was Talking Stick Resort / Casino in Scottsdale, Arizona. His interest in public art has lead him to a three year membership of the Art Design Board of Salt Lake City and to extensive use of Tribal art in Native American casinos.
His photographic work has been exhibited in group and solo exhibitions in the US, Canada, and Europe and on a variety of photographic websites. He now lives in a small fishing village on Nova Scotia’s South Shore in a heavy timber cape originally built in 1823.

 

synopsis

“... the canvas began to appear ... as an arena in which to act. What was to go on the canvas was not a picture but an event."

Harold Rosenberg

 

Brightly painted walls in sunlight have the power to stop me in my tracks. It may be the surprise of something novel or the accidental harmony of the color combinations. I have felt this surprise when confronted with the deep blue of Giotto’s Upper Chapel at San Francesco in Assisi or seeing Blaue Reiter or Fauvist paintings or opening a new box of Color Aid. Often the best color combinations occur as part of a repair effort that wasn’t quite finished, leaving it in a state of unresolved tension like the best abstract expressionist paintings. These painted walls can create an immediate connection between the observer and the painter - a dialogue too often missing from our streets and buildings.

The images in this portfolio come from hours of wandering through poorer parts of cities looking at collapsing walls using a camera instead of a brush to capture what caught my eye. Trying to convey this evanescent quality is slippery. It can pass by your eyes like water.
 

editor's note

Our aim is to disseminate and bring to light telling work of emergent or young photographers.